“Your account has been blocked because we’ve received several reports about your profile being fake” is the screen Sharon Stone posted in December 2019. The same block reaches people nobody has heard of, and every route that works starts from the account you already have.
Intake first. Payment after. Not taken on = refunded.
Two quick answers and an address. We email you a letter built for what happened, with the facts only you can find marked, and where to find each one.
We send it now, then check in a few times over the next week to see how it went. One click stops that.
Bumble blocks real people as fakes when several members report a profile as fake, or when its automated tools flag it, before the person has shown Bumble anything it can check. It is a moderation decision with an appeal: the form linked in the block notice, within six months under Bumble’s Terms. What the appeal needs is proof Bumble can test, sent once: a photo verification offered now, your real name, and the fakes using your face written down. AppealMyBan handles exactly this: we write the appeal you send and file the other routes in your name. The tiers are on the pricing page.
The phrase most people search is the wording Sharon Stone posted in December 2019. We make no claim about how Bumble’s screen reads now.
AppealMyBan is an independent service. Not affiliated with, or endorsed by, Bumble or Bumble Inc.
Tinder and Hinge remove real people as fakes too, under another company’s rules: see banned from Tinder for being fake and banned from Hinge for impersonation. The general Bumble appeal is in our Bumble block guide. This page is about one accusation: that you are not you.
In December 2019 Sharon Stone tweeted that she had joined Bumble and been shut out: “Some users reported that it couldn’t possibly be me”, then “Hey @bumble, is being me exclusionary? Don’t shut me out of the hive.” Her screenshot read: “Your account has been blocked because we’ve received several reports about your profile being fake.” (Global News, 30 December 2019.)
Bumble’s editorial director, Clare O’Connor, replied within a few hours, and the account was restored. Bumble’s official account added: “Looks like our users thought you were too good to be true. We’ve made sure that you won’t be blocked again. We hope that everyone in our community takes a sec to verify their profiles.” Stone answered, as BuzzFeed recorded on 21 May 2024: “Dear Bumble, you are confusing my honesty with your fantasy. This is a disservice to the men and women who partake in @bumble. I am Sharon, I am a woman.”
Our reading of that exchange: the trigger was other members’ reports, not anything Stone posted. The one fix Bumble named was verification. And what restored her was a public post answered by Bumble’s own staff, which needs an audience Bumble cares about. Most people reported as fake have no such audience, and need the routes below.
We work out which routes are actually open to you, write the appeal where the app gives you a box for one, and file the routes outside the app in your name, the first inside 48 hours. We never ask for your password. Intake first, payment after.
Get my case built - $149| Person | App | What they said |
|---|---|---|
| Sharon Stone | Bumble, December 2019 | “Some users reported that it couldn’t possibly be me” |
| Lewis Capaldi | Bumble, Tinder and Hinge, 2022 | “So I’ve been kicked off of Bumble, Tinder, Hinge.” |
| Conor Maynard | Tinder and Hinge, replying to Stone | “This happened to me on both @Tinder and @hinge ... any help guys?” |
| Alicia Silverstone | No app named | “I put a fake profile because I wasn’t comfortable yet being me” |


The people pictured on this page are shown because they spoke publicly about these removals. None of them is connected with AppealMyBan or has endorsed it.
Lewis Capaldi told The Diary of a CEO in 2022 that he had been kicked off Tinder because “people think I’m fake”, and listed Bumble, Tinder and Hinge (BuzzFeed, 21 May 2024). Those apps belong to two companies, so three removals meant at least two separate decisions, and a fix at Match Group does nothing at Bumble.
Alicia Silverstone’s case is the pseudonym trap, not a Bumble ban. She told The Drew Barrymore Show in October 2021: “I put a fake profile because I wasn’t comfortable yet being me ... And then I got kicked off, I got banned.” She named no app for that ban, and joined Bumble under her own name in September 2021 (hola.com, 19 October 2021). Bumble’s Guidelines prohibit false statements about your name, so an invented name used for privacy is itself the breach the reports allege. A first name you really go by is not a false name.
Bumble publishes what it forbids and some of how it checks. It does not publish how it decides that a reported profile is fake.
Tinder and Hinge go further. Both say your face is turned into a number and compared with the faces on other accounts “to help detect whether other profiles are using your likeness” (Tinder, 26 August 2026; Hinge, 29 July 2026). Bumble has not published that it compares faces across accounts in any page we could read, so we do not claim it does.
Our reading of what Bumble has published: a face people recognise, or find hard to believe, draws reports from members who think it cannot really be that person. The reports arrive before any proof does, into a system whose largest termination category is scams. A live photo verification is the one thing a stolen photo cannot do.
The obvious proof makes it worse. Bumble’s Guidelines bar social media and messaging details in the name field, and its EU report says that in September 2025 it widened its inauthentic-profiles policy to accounts that sign up with messaging handles as their name. An @handle meant as proof looks like what scammers do.
Bumble is run by Bumble Inc., a listed company in its own right. Tinder and Hinge are Match Group. That changes the work in three ways.
So, in order:
The case check is free and takes two minutes. It tells you which routes are open on your ban, including the cases where it tells you not to pay anyone.
Proof, to Bumble, is something its own process can test. A news story proves a famous person exists. It does not prove the account is theirs.
Keep the appeal to facts a reviewer can check: the notice, the proof, the fakes, and what you want.
An invented example: “My account, registered to this email, was blocked on 12 August 2026. The notice said Bumble had received reports that my profile was fake, and that the action was automated. The photos are of me and the name is my own. Since March at least three profiles on other platforms have used my photos, and I reported one I found on Bumble on 2 August. I will complete photo verification or Bumble’s ID check today. I ask for a human review, the block lifted and the strike removed.”
Send it once. Bumble’s Terms of 17 June 2026 list manifestly unfounded appeals, reports and complaints as a breach. How to write a ban appeal has the full structure. The general Bumble appeal, with the figures, is in how to get unbanned from Bumble.
For people whose photos feed scam profiles, the fakes and the block are often one story: members who met your face under another name report the next profile that carries it. That is our reading, not Bumble’s statement.
Tinder and Hinge publish impersonation forms that accept a report from someone authorised to act for you. We could not find or read an equivalent Bumble page, so we do not tell you one exists. What Bumble does publish gives the fakes three places to go.
Fakes on other platforms are reported there. Keep every screenshot: it is evidence for Bumble too.
AppealMyBan takes Bumble blocks for impersonation, catfishing and fake-profile reports. You confirm the facts and sign an authority to act; we write the words and send everything a third party may send, copying you as each one goes. We never ask for a password.
What you do: confirm the facts, sign the authority, send the appeal, and verify when Bumble asks. A manager can gather the facts; the account holder signs (appealing a ban for someone else). The first filing goes within 48 hours of us having everything we need, 24 on The Advocate. Start with The Case, or The Advocate if more than one app removed you, or run the free case check.
What we cannot promise: that Bumble lifts the block, how fast anyone replies, or that an EU body’s decision binds Bumble, which Article 21 of the Digital Services Act and Bumble’s own help centre both say it does not. We decline real impersonation, fraud the person actually did, harassment, threats, violence and anything touching minors. Being accused of faking yourself is none of those, and we take those cases.
That members reported the profile as fake and Bumble acted on it. The wording is from the screen Sharon Stone posted in December 2019; Bumble’s screen may read differently now. Reports are anonymous, and the appeal is the form linked in the notice, within six months.
Usually because members reported the profile as fake, or Bumble’s Deception Detector flagged it, before you had verified. An invented name, a handle in the name field or heavily edited photos can look like the impersonation Bumble’s Guidelines prohibit. Your notice should say whether the action was automated or human.
Offer something Bumble can test: photo verification, with three attempts, and its ID check against a live selfie. Put that offer in one appeal through the form in the block notice, with your real name and one official source showing the same face.
Yes, within six months of the decision, through the form linked in the block notice. If the notice is gone, the public Dispute my block or warning form reaches the same queue without a login. Send one appeal with the verification offer and the evidence in it.
Screenshot the fake’s name, age, bio and photos, report it from its profile, and put the impersonation in writing once to the complaints address in Bumble’s Terms. Cite it in your own appeal if you were blocked. Never organise a wave of reports.
No. Bumble Inc. is not Match Group, so a Bumble block does not reach Tinder or Hinge, and theirs do not reach Bumble. It can reach Badoo, which Bumble owns. A Tinder or Hinge removal is a separate case with its own routes.
A first name you really go by is not a false name. An invented one is: Bumble’s Guidelines prohibit false statements about name, and Alicia Silverstone said a dating app banned her after she used a fake profile. She named no app.
No group desk, because Bumble is not part of Match Group. Above the appeal sit the access request, your data regulator if Bumble ignores it, ADR Center or ADR Point for EU residents, and the 60-day notice of dispute for US members.
Written by the case team at AppealMyBan - the same team that drafts the appeals. Banned for years, built this out of the frustration.