Badoo names a reason every time, even when the notice does not. In 58 days of Badoo’s filings to the EU, 22,848 accounts were terminated, 8 times Bumble’s count, and 78% of them were for sexual content or conduct. You have six months to appeal.
Intake first. Payment after. Not taken on = refunded.
Two quick answers and an address. We email you a letter built for what happened, with the facts only you can find marked, and where to find each one.
We send it now, then check in a few times over the next week to see how it went. One click stops that.
When a platform limits, removes or ends something for a user in the EU, the Digital Services Act (DSA) makes it send that user a statement of reasons and file a copy in the European Commission’s transparency database. We downloaded Badoo’s daily files for 30 July to 28 September 2026, 58 days, and counted them. Badoo filed 419,214 decisions. 22,848 of them record an account termination, about 394 a day.
Badoo says “blocked”. In its EU filings every account-level decision is filed as a termination, and none as a suspension. This is what those 22,848 name as the ground, grouped into four families. The last figure in each row shows how many followed a notification: someone told Badoo, rather than Badoo acting on its own initiative. The filing does not say who.
| Ground family | Terminations | Share | Followed a notification |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sexual content and conduct | 17,745 | 77.7% | 70% |
| Age and children | 4,671 | 20.4% | 31% |
| Violence and past harm | 240 | 1.1% | 82% |
| Commercial activity, goods and other | 192 | 0.8% | 62% |
| All terminations | 22,848 | 100.0% | 62% |
Inside the families, the largest single grounds are commercial sex (7,412, 32.4%), cyberflashing (4,988, 21.8%), unwanted sexual content or messages (3,522, 15.4%), underage use (2,501, 10.9%) and adult nudity and sexual activity (1,150, 5.0%). Then come selling or buying adult content (496, 2.2%), alleged harmful past (157, 0.7%) and sexual violence (56, 0.2%). Child sexual exploitation and abuse grounds add up to 2,170 (9.5%).
62.3% of Badoo’s terminations followed a notification, against 12.7% of all its filings. Cyberflashing is the clearest case: 92% of those terminations followed a notification. Age is the opposite: of the 2,501 underage-use terminations, 75% were Badoo’s own initiative.
One thing is missing from the list: conduct that is merely unpleasant. In these 22,848 terminations no ground is about ghosting, unmatching or a low response rate, and only 1% fall under violence or past harm. Badoo’s terminations are about sex and age. Whether a given one was right is what an appeal tests.
Badoo and Bumble are run by the same company, Bumble Inc., and both file grounds from the same list. In the same 58 days Badoo filed 22,848 terminations against Bumble’s 2,859: about 394 a day against 49. Terminations are 5.5% of Badoo’s filings and 1.6% of Bumble’s, and the mix differs. Sexual content or conduct is 78% of Badoo’s terminations against 56% of Bumble’s, while violence and past harm are 1% against 12%.
The database does not say why. Different user bases, different detection and different reporting habits would all produce a gap like this, and the filings cannot separate them. What it does mean in practice is that a block on one app can arrive alongside a block on the other; our Badoo guide covers that. For the Bumble side of the comparison, see what Bumble tells the EU it terminates accounts for.
We work out which routes are actually open to you, write the appeal where the app gives you a box for one, and file the routes outside the app in your name, the first inside 48 hours. We never ask for your password. Intake first, payment after.
Get my case built - $149Most of what Badoo files is not an account block. 396,366 of the 419,214 filings (94.5%) removed a piece of content and left the account open. Four grounds cover nearly all of them: profile misuse (73.0% of the removals), adult nudity and sexual activity (22.1%), controlled goods and substances (2.3%) and violent or graphic content (1.5%). They are overwhelmingly about photos: 96% of the removals concern an image.
If you can still log in but a photo or a bio has gone, you have a content removal, not a block, and the routes are different. Our guide to telling a ban, a challenge, a glitch and a shadowban apart is the place to start.
Badoo marks each filing as automated or not, and the two kinds of decision go opposite ways. Removals are mostly machine work: 308,929 of all 419,214 filings (73.7%) are marked fully automated. Terminations are mostly people work: 20,705 of 22,848 (90.6%) are marked not automated, against 24% of all filings.
So a person made the decision to end the account, and a person is who your appeal has to persuade. These are Badoo’s own labels. Nobody checks them.
The ground may never have reached you. The DSA requires a statement of reasons to be sent to the affected user. If you are in the EU, look for it in the email on the account, including spam. Our DSA guide sets out what it must contain and what it means if it never came.
Someone else may have raised it. 62.3% of terminations followed a notification. You may never have seen the message or the photo that prompted it, and the filing does not identify the sender or the evidence.
An age flag goes through an ID check. Underage use is the fourth-largest single ground, 2,501 terminations (10.9%), and 75% of them did not need anyone to complain. A suspected-underage block runs through Badoo’s ID check, so if you are an adult, the answer to that ground is the check, not an argument about conduct.
A verification wall is not a block. A fraud-flagged profile can be asked to complete additional verification before regaining access. That looks like a block from the outside, and arguing your conduct at it gets nowhere. The Badoo guide shows how to tell the two apart.
The case check is free and takes two minutes. It tells you which routes are open on your ban, including the cases where it tells you not to pay anyone.
Badoo’s own route is the form linked in the block notification. If the notice has gone, the fallback is Badoo’s public “Dispute my block or warning” form, which is live and needs no login. The window runs six months from the block. It is a deadline, not a plan, and sooner is better.
In Badoo’s 2025 EU transparency filing, 9,422 of 127,648 appeals were granted (7.4%), with a median of 2 hours 55 minutes. Read that as a floor, not as your odds: Badoo’s own footnote says the pool mixes blocked members with people appealing a rejected report, because on most in-app reports “only the party reported will get the option to appeal.”
Answer the ground, not the general injustice. If the filing says commercial sex or cyberflashing, the appeal deals with that: what happened, what you can show, what you are asking for. Our guide to writing an appeal that gets read has an example.
File once, and keep it civil. Badoo can stop processing appeals from someone who submits manifestly unfounded ones, so volume is a risk rather than a strategy. There is no Match Group escalation desk above Badoo, because Badoo is not a Match Group app.
We never guarantee reinstatement. The decision belongs to Badoo. What we can do is show which routes are open for your case, and the free check takes two minutes.
It covers the EU. Every filing lists EU member states as its territory. Badoo may decide differently elsewhere.
Not every app shows you this. Tinder, Hinge, OkCupid, Meetic and Plenty of Fish have filed no account-level statement dated after 16 April 2026, so this kind of count is not possible for them. Badoo and Bumble still file them. Our DSA guide has the table.
It counts decisions, not people. One person can appear more than once, and a person can be affected without being counted here.
The ground is Badoo’s label at the time. The Commission does not check a filing for accuracy. A filing says what Badoo decided and why it says so, not whether it was right.
It is a snapshot. These are 58 days, from 30 July to 28 September 2026, not a rule about how Badoo behaves. It also cannot show you your own case; see why you cannot look yourself up.
Do not open a new account. It breaches the same rules, and it can be tied back by details Badoo already holds, such as your phone number, payment method and device. Why the reset is dying explains how.
Do not pay anyone who promises to unblock you. Nobody can promise the platform’s decision. We never ask for your password, and no honest service will.
Do not ignore the notice. Screenshot it before it disappears. The form it links to is the route Badoo points you at, and the ground it names is what your appeal has to answer.
Badoo files a named ground for every account it ends: all 22,848 terminations in its EU filings from 30 July to 28 September 2026 carry one, and 78% are for sexual content or conduct. The notice may show you little, but if you are in the EU a statement of reasons should have reached the email on the account. Check spam, and read the ground before you write the appeal.
Appeal through the form linked in the block notification, inside six months of the block. If the notice has gone, use Badoo’s public “Dispute my block or warning” form, which needs no login. Answer the ground Badoo named, file once, and remember nobody can promise the outcome, including us.
You lose access to the account, and the notice you get carries the link to appeal. In Badoo’s EU filings the decision is recorded as a termination, not a suspension. The appeal window is six months from the block.
Not by a trick, and there is no code that reopens it. The appeal is the form in the block notice, and if you no longer have the notice, Badoo’s public “Dispute my block or warning” form needs no login. Anyone selling a shortcut is selling account fraud.
It can be, and the appeal is where that gets tested. Badoo’s 2025 EU filing shows 9,422 of 127,648 appeals granted (7.4%), though its footnote says that pool mixes blocked members with people appealing a report, so it understates the position of a blocked member. Answer the named ground with what you can show.
Badoo’s own 2025 EU filing gives a median of 2 hours 55 minutes. A median hides the slow cases, and no platform publishes a promise, so file inside the six months and keep the confirmation.
Treat it as permanent unless an appeal succeeds. Every account-level decision in Badoo’s EU filings for the period was a termination, none a suspension, and the appeal window is six months from the block.
Yes, because the two apps are run by the same company, and a block on one can arrive with a block on the other. If you have been blocked on both, appeal each on its own notice and read the Bumble side too.
Written by the case team at AppealMyBan - the same team that drafts the appeals. Banned for years, built this out of the frustration, publishes real numbers including the zeros.